Endorsement.
“The
treatment administered is very effective and the valuable information
on how to dramatically improve your life is vital.” - Randall
L. Butler, Community Cancer Control Manager, American Cancer Society.
American
Medical Association (AMA) Reports.
Conventional
Wellness Programs - 8% success: Survey
results of conventional wellness programs published in the Journal
of the American Medical Association (JAMA) reported only an 8% success
rate for those treated with conventional treatment methods.
Conventional
Weight Loss Programs - 6% success: The
AMA reports that permanent weight loss with conventional treatment
only realizes a 6% success rate.
Conventional
Smoking Cessation Programs - 18% success: Treatment
for tobacco cessation utilizing prescribed medications; nicotine-treated
patches, gum and inhalers produced only an 18% success rate.
FREND
Group Clinic's success rate.
Stress
Reduction up to 95% success.
Weight
Loss up to 59% success.
Smoking
Cessation up to 74% success.
FREND's
advanced all-encompassing program is an educational and inspirational
self-improvement behavior modification treatment program.
It
utilizes advanced techniques similar to those developed at respected
research institutions such as Stanford, Harvard, UCLA, John Hopkins,
Mayo Clinic and HMI.
They
are the most advanced, effective, and safest approach we know of
today for behavior modification including stress reduction and stress-related
issues.
Reports
from prestigious research facilities.
The
following are more reports from the American Medical Association (AMA),
Harvard Medical School, Mayo Clinic, and Emergency Treatment Center
Studies regarding the use of hypnotherapeutic modalities for behavior
modification.
Journal
of the American Medical Association (JAMA)
In
1958, the American Medical Association endorsed the use of clinical
hypnotherapy as an ideal treatment for behavior modification and the
elimination of undesirable habits such as stress, smoking and excess
weight.
In 1962, the American Medical Association endorsed the use of hypnoanesthesia
for use as an alternative to chemical anesthesia for pain relief and
surgical anesthesia.
National
Institutes of Health recommends hypnotherapy.
Since
1995, the National Institutes of Health has recommended hypnotherapy
as a treatment for chronic pain. Other conditions for which hypnotherapy
is frequently used include anxiety and addiction
The
following are three pictures published in the Journal of the American
Medical Association.
Burn
Victim:
Chemical
anesthesia could not be administered to this severely burned patient.
Doing so could cause the patient to go into life-threatening shock.
Clinical hypnosis was used to relieve and prevent pain. This is called
Hypnoanesthesia. The hypnotherapist is checking the depth of hypnosis
the patient is in by using an arm levitation test.
The
hypnotherapist (right side of picture) is keeping the patient in a
painless state while the surgeon (left side of picture) surgically
removes the dead tissue and changes bandages. With her eyes closed,
the patient is completely aware of what is going on, but does not
feel any pain. Pictures published in the Journal of the American Medical
Association, 1955. (Copyright expired.)
Brain
Surgery:

A
picture of a man undergoing open brain surgery without use of chemical
anesthesia. A 4X4 inch portion of his skull cap has been removed to
access his brain. He is in a state of hypnosis (somnambulism, stage
3). He feels no pain. He is aware of what is going on and communicating
with the surgeon. The surgeon is on the left side of picture, and
the hypnotherapist is on the right.
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL Case #1:
r.
Radiologist
Elvira Lang teaches at the “Harvard Medical School”.
She is shown here with a patient conducting
a study At The University Of Iowa. Her new study shows that clinical
hypnosis can reduce the need for meds -- and make surgery faster and
smoother.
Conclusion:
Half the group decided to take no medicines at all, just
hypnosis. The heart rate, blood pressure and blood oxygen levels remained
more stable among the hypnosis patients than the non-hypnotic group,
so their surgeries went significantly faster. (Courtesy: Beth Israel
Deaconess Medical Center. Posted 8 August, 2000)
HARVARD
MEDICAL SCHOOL Case #2:
Carol
Ginandes and Daniel Rosenthal, professor of radiology at the “Harvard
Medical School”, published a report on their
study of hypnosis to speed up the mending of broken bones and put
down many myths about hypnosis.
They
recruited 12 people with broken ankles who did not require surgery
and who received the usual treatment at “Massachusetts General
Hospital” in Boston. Ginandes hypnotized half of them once a
week for 12 weeks, while the other half received only normal treatment.
(Note: The same doctor applied the casts and other care, and the same
radiologists took regular X-rays to monitor how well they healed.
A radiologist who evaluated the X-rays did not know which patients
underwent hypnosis.)
Conclusion:
Those who were hypnotized healed faster than those who were
not. Six weeks after the fracture, those in the hypnosis group showed
the equivalent of eight and a half weeks of healing. (Courtesy: Harvard
Gazette Archives Reference: Harvard University Gazette May 8, 2003
(Staff photo by Stephanie Mitchell)
MAYO
CLINIC:
At
Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research conducting extensive
studies of hypnosis for use in numerous medical conditions.
Many important trials reviewed here have helped to establish the role
of hypnosis in contemporary medicine. These trials have established
the utility and efficacy of hypnosis for several medical conditions,
either alone or as part of the treatment regimen.
Health
care providers changed their attitudes significantly and positively
when presented with information about the use of hypnosis in medicine.
Conclusion:
The acceptance of hypnosis as a mode of treatment in medicine
is increasing as a result of “careful, methodical, empirical
work of many research pioneers.”Sebastian Schulz-Stübner,
M.D., Ph.D., Studies Hypnosis As Sedation Alternative. University
of Iowa News Release February 6, 2003
UNIVERSITY
OF IOWA:
Sebastian
Schulz-Stübner, M.D., Ph.D., University of Iowa assistant professor
of anesthesia, investigated whether clinical hypnosis
could be used in place of sedating drugs to relax patients undergoing
surgery with local or regional anesthesia.
In
Schulz-Stübner’s study, 48 patients undergoing surgery
that required local anesthesia received clinical hypnosis in place
of sedating drugs. The study was performed in Aachen University in
Germany, where Schulz-Stübner was a physician prior to his move
to the UI.
Conclusion:
The technique proved to be very successful... All patients
undergoing elective surgery were successfully hypnotized and did not
require sedating drugs.
EMERGENCY
TREATMENT CENTER STUDIES:

Conclusion:
Studies
with children in emergency treatment centers show that hypnotherapeutic
techniques similar to ours, reduces fear, anxiety, discomfort, and
improves self-control and cooperation with medical personnel.
ADDITIONAL STUDIES:
Conclusion:
83
percent of children significantly or completely recovered from the
following: Obesity, asthma, fecal incontinence, anxiety, pain, problematic
habits (sleep walking, thumb sucking, nail biting).

Email:
DrRicci@TheFRENDGroup.org
Telephone
toll-free: 1-(866)
377-4224 |